cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik Universitas Medan Area
Published by Universitas Medan Area
ISSN : 25491660     EISSN : 25501305     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political UMA), publish by Universitas Medan Area, for information and communication resources for academics, and observers of Governance Sciences, Social Sciences, Political Sciences, Methodology of Social Sciences and Social Work. The published paper is the result of research, reflection, and actual critical study with respect to the themes of governance, social, and political science.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance" : 6 Documents clear
Waste Management Problems on Bawean Island, Indonesia Hasanul Bulqiyah
JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political Social UMA) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jppuma.v11i1.8822

Abstract

The policy on waste management in Gresik Regency is not implemented in Bawean Island, which is part of the Gresik Regency area. The absence of Temporary Processing Sites (TPS) and Final Processing Sites (TPA) has made the waste problem more widespread which has an impact on people's lives on Bawean Island. The purpose of this research is to find out the problems in waste management on Bawean Island. Qualitative research methods were used to explore the problems of waste management policy on Bawean Island through interviews, observation, and also documentation at the Gresik Regency Environmental Service and Community Leaders on Bawean Island by selecting subjects using purposive sampling. The results of the study found that the non-implementation of policies regarding waste management in Gresik Regency on Bawean Island was due to budget being the main problem for implementing waste management policies on Bawean Island. Then the government's lack of readiness in managing waste on Bawean Island, such as the lack of a Detailed Engineering Design (DED) concept, facilities and infrastructure in waste management, and outreach to the people of Bawean Island.  
Kebijakan Pemerintah Indonesia Dalam Menyikapi COVID-19 Antara Pendekatan Adaptif Dan Saintifik Bambang Irawan; Zarina Zulkifli; Paisal Akbar; Muhammad Jafar Loilatu; Adil Hasan Ibrahim
JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political Social UMA) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jppuma.v11i1.8832

Abstract

This study describes the Indonesian government's policy options in dealing with COVID-19. To explain research policy options using a scientific and adaptive approach in making policies for handling COVID-19. The Indonesian government's response to the handling of COVID-19 is considered slow due to the policy choices taken. In three years, the handling of COVID-19 has faced different policy choices and policy focuses. This study uses a qualitative approach to review government policies through a narrative policy framework analysis by selecting policies at the macro level to find out the government's steps in handling COVID-19. The findings of this study indicate that the approach used by the Government of Indonesia in handling COVID-19 tends to be adaptive. The adaptive policy is seen from the policy goals that are quite a lot that causes the handling of COVID-19 to be slow. This approach option is different from the scientific approach, which tends to have consistent goals and chooses to look at the conditions of the crisis that occurred. The use of this adaptive approach ignores the political process, which is slow and hinders the policymaking process.  
Anti-Corruption Programs for Governors' Campaign Period 2017-2018 in Java Island Muhammad Bramantyo
JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political Social UMA) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jppuma.v11i1.8931

Abstract

Most of the studies regarding political campaigns focus heavily on strategy, evaluation, and communication by the candidate during the campaign. However, the study regarding anti-corruption programs campaigned by political candidates is still under research. This study examines the anti-corruption programs proposed by candidates for governor and vice governor on Java Island during 2017-2018 regional election. Further, this study employed a qualitative method using content analysis. The three objectives of this study are to examine the existence of anti-corruption program in vision-mission-working programs (VWMP) set by candidates, communication regarding anti-corruption programs during campaigning, and explanation of anti-corruption programs during electoral debate. The results revealed that only six of the thirteen candidates who ran for regional office included anti-corruption programmes in their VWMPs, seven candidates communicated their programs during the campaign period, and nearly all candidates explained their anti-corruption strategy in the electoral debate because the panelists asked them the question. It is argued that candidates did not prioritize campaigning for their anti-corruption programs because programs such as economic development, free education, and health care are more likely to get sympathy and support from voters
Collaborative Governance in Handling Public Complaints to the President at the Ministry of State Secretariat Haswan Boris Muda Harahap; Ermaya Suradinta; Dedeh Maryani; Ahmad Averus
JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political Social UMA) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jppuma.v11i1.9247

Abstract

The handling of public complaints on all types of problems generally falls under the authority of the relevant agencies to resolve them, so that collaboration with relevant agencies is needed in handling public complaints to the President. This study aims to analyze the handling of public complaints against the President based on the Collaborative Governance theory and model that has been running so far and to build a collaborative governance model design that is needed in handling public complaints. This research methodology uses qualitative data with primary sources of interviews, observations, and group discussions. The secondary data was obtained through various documents and literature studies. The results of the study show that Collaborative Governance in handling public complaints to the President at the Ministry of State Secretariat is not yet optimal because the main dimension of Institutional Design in the form of a legal framework that serves as a guideline in collaborative handling of public complaints to the President is not yet available. Researchers formulate Regulated Collaborative Governance which emphasizes the importance of compiling an Institutional Design before starting the collaboration process. The Regulated Collaborative Governance model is a modification of the Collaborative Governance model proposed by Ansell and Gash.
Accountability, Transparency, and Employee Performance in Organizational Asset Management in Buddhist Religious Organizations: Evidence from the Regional Office of the Ministry of Religion of South Sumatra Province Wiswadas Wiswadas; Kgs. M. Sobri; Andy Alfatih; Alamsyah Alamsyah
JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political Social UMA) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jppuma.v11i1.9251

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effect of accountability and transparency on employee performance in Buddhist. The study employed quantitative design with a Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) approach to analyze data collected from 170 respondents. The findings showed that accountability and transparency had a positive and significant effect on employee performance in Buddhist organizations. This result provide important implications for organizational management and the need to foster a culture of accountability and transparency to enhance employee performance. The study also has practical implications for organizational leaders and policy makers who seek to improve the effectiveness of their organizations. By promoting accountability and transparency, organizations can build trust with stakeholders and enhance their reputation, which can lead to increased support and resources.
Revisiting the Civil Society and Democratic Governance in Africa: Present or Absent in Nigeria? Samuel Adetola Ogunwa; Florence Adeseeke Ogunwa
JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political Social UMA) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jppuma.v11i1.9261

Abstract

The civil society midwife democratic government in 1999. They fought for it. Although, some died in the process of agitating for democracy, and the fundamental human rights and rule of law are firmly entrenched including the freedom of association, free movement, speech among others. The paper argues that today’s democratic government was worked for but those who work for it did not participate in the transition program since the military in their characteristics are maradonic particularly that of General Ibrahim Gbadamosi Babangida keep transition program in perplexity and continuous. The failure of the leaders and members of civil organizations to participate is responsible for the crisis of governance. Those elected into governments across the states including the federal government largely masquerading behind politics as governance output. The paper is of the view that the civil society organization in the country cannot claim irresponsible to Nigerians, since they ushered in democratic rule, therefore, efforts must be geared towards validating the purpose of democracy and dividends of democratic governance in Nigeria.  

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol 10, No 1 (2022): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol 9, No 2 (2021): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance a Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol 9, No 1 (2021): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance a Vol 8, No 2 (2020): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance a Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol 8, No 1 (2020): JPPUMA Juni Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol 8, No 1 (2020): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance a Vol 7, No 2 (2019): JPPUMA Desember Vol 7, No 2 (2019): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance a Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol 7, No 1 (2019): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance a Vol 7, No 1 (2019): JPPUMA Juni Vol 6, No 2 (2018): Desember Vol. 6 No. 2 (2018): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol 6, No 2 (2018): Desember Vol 6, No 2 (2018): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance a Vol 6, No 1 (2018): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance a Vol. 6 No. 1 (2018): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol 6, No 1 (2018): JPPUMA JUNI Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol 5, No 2 (2017): JPPUMA Desember Vol 5, No 2 (2017): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance a Vol 5, No 1 (2017): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance a Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol 5, No 1 (2017): JPPUMA JUNI Vol 4, No 2 (2016): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance a Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol 4, No 2 (2016): JPPUMA DESEMBER Vol. 4 No. 1 (2016): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol 4, No 1 (2016): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance a Vol 4, No 1 (2016): JPPUMA JUNI Vol 3, No 2 (2015): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance a Vol 3, No 2 (2015): JPPUMA DESEMBER Vol. 3 No. 2 (2015): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol 3, No 1 (2015): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance a Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol 3, No 1 (2015): JPPUMA JUNI Vol 2, No 2 (2014): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance a Vol 2, No 2 (2014): JPPUMA DESEMBER Vol. 2 No. 2 (2014): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol. 2 No. 1 (2014): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol 2, No 1 (2014): JPPUMA JUNI Vol 2, No 1 (2014): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance a Vol 1, No 2 (2013): JPPUMA DESEMBER Vol. 1 No. 2 (2013): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol 1, No 2 (2013): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance a Vol 1, No 1 (2013): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance a Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance Vol 1, No 1 (2013): JPPUMA JUNI More Issue